Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 3281 - 3300 of 7,529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Holding Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 31776(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept 23, 2016], may be the first reported ruling in which a New York court has imposed a statutory surcharge in a dissolution case. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Les deux appels sont rejetés, l’un avec dissidence. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division explained that "[u]nder [New York State’s] Human Rights Law, an employer cannot be held liable for an employee's discriminatory act[s] unless the employer became a party to [them] by encouraging, condoning, or approving [them]. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 3:30 pm
Thus, an insurer who settles with some parties injured in a collision is liable only for the remainder of the policy limits even though it may have been aware that the total claims would probably exceed the policy limits (Duprey v Security Mut. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:28 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Indeed, the Fifth Circuit expressed concern that allowing U- visa discovery “may sow confusion over when and how U-visa information may be disclosed, deterring immigrant victims of abuse . . . from stepping forward and thereby frustrating Congress’s intent in enacting the U visa program. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Decisions involving an employee’s use of the employer's electronic equipment that resulted in disciplinary action being taken against an employee [Internet links highlighted in color]Sprague v Spokane Valley Fire Department Sprague v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:42 am by Joy Waltemath
Nonetheless, said the court, if the claimants have applied for U visas, their jobs may still be on the line, contrary to the district court’s apparent belief. [read post]