Search for: "U.S. v. Washington"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 11,815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2018, 3:45 am
For The Washington Post, Gregory Schneider and Robert Barnes report that in Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
As the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, George Will urges the justices to review Chandler v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 3:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:34 am
Late Monday, November 5, the U.S. government filed three extraordinary petitions for writ of certiorari before judgment to the Supreme Court in cases in New York, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 4:30 am
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s oral argument in Republic of Sudan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 6:54 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Republic of Sudan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
Berryhill,” meaning that means that “Gupta will argue a position in the case that the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Bucklew v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:47 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
Bell: U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
They did not grant any cert petitions, and they declined to vacate a decision by the U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am
” Greg Stohr reports at Bloomberg that “[a] formal ceremony next week at the U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 8:40 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Despite the inappropriateness of considering the Bazemore precedent after the Court decided Daubert, many lower court decisions have treated Bazemore as dispositive of reliability challenges to regression analyses, without any meaningful discussion.11 In the last several years, however, the appellate courts have awakened on occasion to their responsibilities to ensure that opinions of statistical expert witnesses, based upon regression analyses, are evaluated through the lens of Rule 702.12 1 Brock… [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm
In Flowers v. [read post]
