Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court"
Results 3281 - 3300
of 3,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2016, 11:28 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas because it is known as a “rocket docket” in which complaints proceed to trial quickly, that’s not indicative of a potential victory, according to William E. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
’” William J. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
One such Dred Scott case was the result of a bench trial in a federal district court in Atlanta, in Wells v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
By making the date March 1st rather than January 31st, the adjustment of the maintenance income cap would coincide with the date of adjustment of the child support combined parental income cap, as well as the date of adjustment of the federal poverty income level and self-support reserve. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 April 2020 the High Court handed down judgment in the case of Smethurst v Commissioner of Police [2020] HCA 14 holding that that the warrant the Australian Federal Police used to search News Corp journalist Annika Smethurst’s home in 2019 was invalid. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Trout of bounds: the effects of the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals’ misguided Fifth Amendment takings analysis in Casitas Municipal Water District v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
William W. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:09 pm
SIPPEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 5:36 am
The Court heard arguments in Connick v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 10:14 pm
Lee mentions:The court should also take advantage of Microsoft v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:27 am
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois 2009). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 8:03 am
" Bennett v.. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
Federal Election Commission (2003) and Nixon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive… [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 2:34 am
The state trial court found no Fifth Amendment violation because the "invocation was ambiguous," the state appellate court affirmed, and the federal district court (E.D. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm
In one case, for example, a district court (in an opinion affirmed by the U.S. [read post]
