Search for: "Benjamin May" Results 3301 - 3320 of 3,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2006, 1:08 am
Your response may be posted on the blog if you have no objection; please tell me if you do object. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by SOIssues
The rise in care applications since the death of Peter Connolly constitutes an important step change in awareness, which suggests the long-established tendency to give parents the benefit of the doubt may have temporarily stopped. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 1:55 pm by Robert Chesney
Charges Against Taza Gul Alizai According to the superseding indictment unsealed today in Manhattan federal court: In May 2008, in the vicinity of Kandahar, Afghanistan, Gul sold approximately five kilograms of heroin to a DEA confidential source (CS). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 7:10 am by Ilya Somin
Bush solicitor general and conservative "super-lawyer" Ted Olson, Republican election law expert Benjamin Ginsberg, and David Hoppe, longtime aide to a variety of GOP members of Congress. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 12:35 pm by Alicia Maule
A detective confirmed that he would be, in contravention of best practices and current New York law, which requires law enforcement to caution a witness that the alleged perpetrator may or may not be present. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 7:52 am
These may be understood or rationalized as a foundational set of  popular liberties which are threatened by the thrust of innovation by those who exercise the power of gubernaculum.[1] For others it may be a fear springing from the exercise of gubernaculum in ways that threaten social solidarity—of a religion, ethnicity or way of life.[2] At the other end of the fear spectrum, revolution may be rationalized within notions of threat to the loss of an opportunity… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
Benjamin, 328 F.2d 854 (2d Cir. 1964)). [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 11:18 am by Giles Peaker
I can see that a question may arise whether a de minimis gap between planters, say measured in a small number of millimetres, is permissible. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In some cases, for example, government action may seek to compel the promotion of a particular norm—such as acceptance of others—that may be contrary to the deeply held views of an individual or group. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm by Melanie Fontes
The purpose of the phrase may be to assure that after impeachment a trial on criminal charges is not foreclosed by the principle of double jeopardy. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To be sure, states may choose to retain their exemption for religious objectors to vaccines. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Neighbors sue the clinic, claiming its operation is a nuisance, because it makes them fearful that future attacks will harm them as well.[1] If the neighbors win, that in effect means that Danielle had a legal duty to comply with the arsonists' demands (at least to the extent of moving to a place that may be more expensive for her, and less convenient for patients). [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 6:49 am by Andrew Miller
Hamas may have had reason not take such a warning from the infamously impulsive president lightly. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:59 pm
His view may be that Adarand and Loving v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
John Marshall, Oliver Wendell Holmes, and Benjamin Cardozo are among the Supreme Court justices who have grappled with how to interpret the jurisdictional phrase “arising under. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 4:01 am by Alice Woolley
The response may be that we do not in fact accept the legitimacy of jurors refusing to apply the law just because they don’t agree with it. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by Schachtman
Exploring pathology can help us appreciate proper physiological function, and how normal functioning can be lost. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The dissents of Justices John McLean and Benjamin Curtis showed how the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roger Taney ignored the Court’s own precedents and disregarded specific grants of power in the constitution. [read post]