Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 3,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
By December 2008, Newsweek reported that the size of the market amounted to US$600 trillion[v], an exponential increase when compared with the size the market had in 1993 and 2006. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm
In WIC Radio Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
In this sense, it is reasonable to say that ICANN governs the DNS and it directly affects the rights of the global Internet community. [33] V. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Bradley (Duke), Bradford R. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
The parties are likewise duking it out about whether the underlying decision at issue in the four-time relist Trump v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:53 am
In Summum v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
BARKER, 2005 Duke L. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
School Debt-to-Income Ratio Median Debt Median Income Stanford Univ. 0.77 $120,410 $156,700 Harvard Univ. 0.84 $133,617 $158,200 Duke Univ. 0.85 $138,000 $162,200 Univ. of Pennsylvania 0.86 $149,729 $175,100 Univ. of Chicago 0.86 $146,806 $170,500 Cornell Univ. 0.88 $153,937 $175,200 Northwestern Univ. 0.91 $156,418 $171,900 Brigham Young Univ. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm
Durham, NC: Duke University Press. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Nielsen [and] Pars Equality Center v Pompeo (Pars Eqaulity). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:20 pm
V. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Nielsen [and] Pars Equality Center v Pompeo (Pars Equality). [read post]
