Search for: "English v. English" Results 3301 - 3320 of 11,209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2018, 10:17 am
The Court also noted the NZ Supreme Court decision in R v Dixon [2015] NZSC 147 [see here], holding that digital CCTV footage was both a ‘document’ and ‘property’ under the NZ Crimes Act 1961. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:03 am by Chris Attig
Bernal, Attorney Appellant’s Opening Brief Appellee’s Response Brief Appellant’s Reply Brief   #3:  English v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
However, the circumstances in that case were unique as the Court relied on a prior English High Court ruling on the same issue between the same parties. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 5:25 pm
Supreme Court case, Kennedy v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by ASAD KHAN
The court held that under the scheme in Pt 5A, a migrant’s English speaking abilities were a neutral factor. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by ASAD KHAN
Third, it wrongly treated her proficiency in English and financial independence as neutral rather than positive factors in her favour. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 5:27 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Mann today handed down judgment today in the case of Sir Cliff Richard OBE v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch)). [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 11:18 am by Yash Naidoo
The English Court of Appeal in a June 2018 judgment confirmed the principles relating to informed consent in medical malpractice claims. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am by CMS
This Facility Agreement contained an express choice of English law and English jurisdiction clause. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:00 am
 Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more;Or close the wall up with our English dead! [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 8:50 pm
  A summary of the proposed changes are discussed in English by Reuters, the BBC, CTV News, the Independent, and Havana Times. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
  In these cases, the English courts affirmed the best interests test as both the basis for judicial intervention in parental decision-making in medical matters and the test to be applied in deciding on applications. [read post]