Search for: "Fair v. State" Results 3301 - 3320 of 27,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2009, 7:52 am
  There has been some discussion, for example, about whether or not there needs to be an equal number of check boxes on each side (favoring fair use v. disfavoring fair use) in order for the checklist to itself be fair. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:22 pm by Margaret Wood
Henry the Sixth in infant bands crowned King Whose state so many had the managing That they lost France and made his England bleed. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:18 am by Leland E. Beck
The Supreme Court of the United States declined today to end the judicial practice of deferring to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations in “friend of the court” briefs filed with a court in Christopher v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 11:09 am by Eric Goldman
State Constitution Protection for Free Speech Censorship enthusiasts love citing the California Supreme Court Pruneyard v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am by Dave
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:37 am by Dave
We have been aware of Coombes v LB Waltham Forest (Sec of State intervening) noted at [2010] All ER (D) 59 and on Lawtel, decided on 08.03.2010 in an extempore judgment (Cranston J), but waiting for the full transcript to be provided by the High Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 12:12 pm by Leland Garvin
The 2nd DCA affirmed the dismissal of the case, citing precedent set by the Florida Supreme Court in Mizrahi v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 9:16 am
The 9th here held that the state court did not abuse its discretion in balancing the right to counsel against concerns of fairness and scheduling as set forth by the Supremes in Gonzalez-Lopez. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 1:00 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States last month denied certiorari in a 3rd Circuit FLSA case entitled  Philadelphia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:47 pm by MEL
What To Do If Your Employer Won’t Listen Employer and Employee Rights and Obligations Ontario Court of Appeal Rules on Employer’s Manner of Dismissal – Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing     The post McGuinty v. 1845035 Ontario Inc. [read post]