Search for: "GROUP v. STATE"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 37,532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
The federal Privacy Rule only applies to a relatively narrow group of what are called “covered entities,” such as doctors, hospitals, and health insurers. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Hogan, defendants in both federal and state criminal cases may plead the fifth. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 2:26 pm
[v] Sallee v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:19 pm
The OFCCP’s proposed changes would also require post-secondary institutions or other contractors “with campus-like settings” that maintain multiple affirmative action programs to submit the information requested in the scheduling letter and itemized listing “for all AAPs developed for campuses, schools, programs, buildings, departments, or other parts of [the] institution or company” located in the same city and state as the audited location. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:12 am
In the letter, the DRB stated that it found no evidence that Bagnara reaped any benefit from All-Pro for procuring title insurance clients beyond the typical goodwill of an employer-employee relationship. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
On Dec. 13, 2022, the Israeli Supreme Court published a 51-page judgment in Kohelet Forum v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am
Under the New York State Constitution, only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to order dissolution of a marriage. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 10:59 am
Secondly, via Williams v London Borough of Southwark (2000) All ER (D) 377, a commission could be retained where it was a payment for work done. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
” * Jones v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:22 pm
Ashlesh Biradar v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
File first in federal court or, in all likelihood, lose in state court. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am
Across the country, paramilitaries have shown up, armed and intimidating, at events supporting white supremacy, school board meetings debating COVID policies or more inclusive curricula, LGBTQ–friendly events, and demonstrations in opposition to the Supreme Court’s overruling of Roe v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
From Mumma v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:26 am
She was attending a rally with one of the most violent and intolerant groups in the history of the United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 3:56 am
Regarding damages, “to survive a … pre·answer dismissal motion, a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct [or nonfeasance] may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
It held in General Electric, Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
Carr deemed the statement insufficient and removed Lathus from the CPAB, stating that "[t]hose that do not immediately denounce hateful, violent groups do not share my values and will not be a part of my team. [read post]
