Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 3301 - 3320 of 6,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Accordingly, the court found that it did not have jurisdiction over the case under CAFA and granted the State’s motion to remand. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 12:55 am
Charles Ornstein, who had covered earlier aspects of the Cha / Flamm controversy, had a piece in the Nov. 21 issue of the Los Angeles Times that began:A Los Angeles County Superior Court judge Tuesday [Nov. 20] threw out a defamation lawsuit filed by a prominent South Korean fertility scientist against a Riverside doctor who has been critical of his work.Dr. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:07 am by Nassiri Law
This particular conflict began with three lawsuits in the Superior Court of California County of San Diego separately filed last summer by female professors at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California. [read post]
24 May 2007, 3:00 pm
Ralphs Grocery Company, Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:02 pm by The Complex Litigator
(February 28, 2011), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Three) reversed an order granting summary judgment in favor of Metson. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.html One petition for certiorari was granted on 1/13/23: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 10:01 am by Law Lady
NORMANDY VILLAGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Injunctions -- Mortgage foreclosure -- Trial court acted within its inherent authority to sanction abusive litigant when it issued omnibus order granting permanent injunction barring future filings relating to foreclosure proceeding or filing future actions arising out of foreclosure proceedings in the circuitLINDSAY JENKINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
However, the trial court abused its discretion by disqualifying the Firm’s attorneys from representing the Firm in all pretrial phases of the litigation without making any findings as to how their continued behind-the-scenes activities preceding trial would undermine the purposes of the advocate-witness rule.'” “It was Stanislaus Superior Court Judge John D. [read post]