Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 6,209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2013, 6:51 am
” Accordingly, while the first two paragraphs of the proposal for settlement stated that the wife was the sole offeror, the proposal, as a whole, offered that both the husband and the wife would dismiss their claims against the defendant upon the defendant’s acceptance. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:07 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:43 am
Hughes v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
A spouse’s right to occupy the family residence stemmed not from her husband’s permission, but from the very family relationship itself. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Inasmuch as the husband’s income exceeded that of the wife (at the time of trial, the husband earning $134,924.48 annually, with the J.H.O. imputing income of $25,000 to the wife), the husband was the “noncustodial” parent. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 10:38 am
The father (ex-husband) had a variety of qualms about the judges. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:19 pm
In Durfee v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:16 am
According to one of the briefs filed with the Court of Appeals, when Hall worked for the Hardins she lived in a house with two former spouses and the wife’s new husband; Hall lived in the basement. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:49 pm
The June 26, 2013 Court of Appeals opinion in Simpson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:52 am
The case of US v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
S. 586, 593–594 (1890) (“The whole subject of the domestic relations of husband and wife, parent and child, belongs to the laws of the States and not to the laws of the United States”). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:13 am
The defendants rejected the offer, declined to make a counter offer, and not long after, took the house off the market, with the wife allegedly saying she would buy out the husband and continue living there. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:25 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
Therefore, the accredited investor definition’s use of the word “spouse” is no longer restricted by DOMA to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
Therefore, the accredited investor definition’s use of the word “spouse” is no longer restricted by DOMA to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:23 pm
Section 3 goes on to provide that the word “spouse” refers only to a person of an opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
The significance of state responsibilities for the definition and regulation of marriage dates to the Nation’s beginning; for “when the Constitution was adopted the common understanding was that the domestic relations of husband and wife and parent and child were matters reserved to the States,” Ohio ex rel. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:19 am
” But there’s a significant exception: “[f]or federal tax purposes, a marriage means only a legal union between a man and a woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” means a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife. [read post]
