Search for: "Marks v. State" Results 3301 - 3320 of 19,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Mark, 425 F.3d 505, 508-11 (8th Cir. 2005); Holm, 326 F.3d at 877-78; United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Koller, 472 U.S. 424, 430–31(1985) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); seealso Cohen v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Kraemer has a lot to say about state enforcement of cultural beliefs; NYT v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
When it heard oral argument in Pearson v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 5:44 pm
Counterfeit Chic provides a copy of the complaint in Victoria's Secret v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Given the high percentage of the market open to Doncaster Pharmaceuticals even where it could not use the REGURIN trade mark, SEP's exclusive use of the REGURIN mark in the UK did not contribute to the artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States for trospium chloride. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
He comments on the decision of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in William Mark Corporation & Another v Gift House International Ltd [2014] EWHC 2845 (IPEC). [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais and Venice Simplon-Orient Express, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:25 am
It claims that Defendants are using those marks and/or marks that are substantially similar. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The case at issue was an opposition to an application of a mark combining the sign “V” with words “Valentino Rudi” by the Italian high end fashion company Valentino. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
 After all, "holiday" is no more than a state of mind, surely. [read post]