Search for: "Matter of Novel"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 7,153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2016, 10:00 pm
CBM patents differ from utility patents in that they do not cover "technological inventions,"those inventions claiming novel and unobvious technological features. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:28 am
Similarly, the civil society groups were hugely consequential during the Bush administration in using FOIA and novel lawsuits and activist campaigns to bring extraordinary change to Bush administration practices on detention and interrogation, among others. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 2:41 pm
This may be misread by some to imply that these standards matter less than getting business to engage in the SDGs on any terms. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
The latter criticism figured centrally in his commentary on Justice Antonin Scalia’s Tanner Lectures, A Matter of Interpretation. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Arendi S A.R.L., et al., No. 16-626 (can “common sense” invalidate a patent claim that includes novel elements?) [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am
Preliminary matters. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am
Preliminary matters. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:16 am
[I think this understates the importance of defining what’s not patentable—there are useful features that are not eligible for utility patents b/c not sufficiently novel, but also that should be committed to the public domain for that reason—defines what must be free to use, not just what is appropriable. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 3:18 pm
(In an unacknowledged irony, this approach – dispensing with accumulated jurisprudence in a bid to return to the textual meaning, informed by renewed analysis of the drafting history of the relevant provisions – is precisely the approach taken by the High Court in Cole v Whitfield, which as previously noted was remarkably novel at that time in Australian constitutional jurisprudence. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
The opinions relating to this defect do not require new or novel scientific methodology. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
The opinions relating to this defect do not require new or novel scientific methodology. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:38 am
The opinions relating to this defect do not require new or novel scientific methodology. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
They must be novel, distinct and not obvious. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
Holder, arguing that no matter who wins today’s election, “the Roberts Court is largely to blame for stripping away protections we know now more than ever we still needed. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
Int'l L. 406, 413 (1947) (“American readers were less inclined to read the novels of Cooper or Hawthorne for a dollar when they could buy a novel of Scott or Dickens for a quarter. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:33 am
We invite contributions analysing any of Kundera’s novels (or all of them, for that matter) from the point of view of his engagement with the topic of ‘Law’, most broadly understood. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:45 am
They must be novel, distinct and not obvious. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:45 am
They must be novel, distinct and not obvious. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:24 am
These non-essential elements are excluded from later analysis.A "data analysis problem" is always selected if the biomarker (or the method for its measurement) is not novel in its own right. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:59 pm
” The solicitor simply shrugged, and our dialogue moved on to the matters of undue influence and duress. [read post]
