Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2012, 11:39 am
First Party v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:50 pm
So far this debate is relatively standard. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm
But “spirits” do not offer clear standards and are open to abuse. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:33 am
And that means that their client is the system of criminal justice and it means, more precisely, that their client is Justice (note the uppercase J) whatever the hell Justice is.Back in 1935, writing in Berger v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:29 am
Ground 1: the Technical Standards Directive BT and TalkTalk's case on this ground was that the Contested Provisions should have been notified in draft to the EU Commission pursuant to the Technical Standards Directive (Directive 98/34 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations, as amended by Directive 98/48). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:17 pm
No proceedings were brought against the blogger or commenters, although they were brought in respect of an article on the subject in the Evening Standard. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:49 pm
On Monday, in Martel v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:55 am
The Oracle v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Kimberly Nakamauru, Comment, Touching a Nerve: Hertz v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Montalvo v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Supp. 2d 684, 691 (W.D.N.C. 2003) (“Epidemiologic data that shows a risk cannot support an inference of cause unless (1) the data are statistically significant according to scientific standards used for evaluating such associations; (2) the relative risk is sufficiently strong to support an inference of ‘more likely than not’; and (3) the epidemiologic data fits the plaintiff’s case in terms of exposure, latency, and other relevant variables. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am
Courts favor defendant when they appreciate a precise and tangible social value promoted by the unauthorized use of the mark. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:10 am
In this week’s case (Prempeh v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:41 pm
In Brehm v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:02 am
File this one right next to “Brown v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:33 am
The court rejected these arguments, noting that “such a precise pleading standard has never been adopted. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
Take HHS v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
., v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:01 pm
Peck, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of New York, issued an opinion and order (order) on February 24th in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:56 am
By Eric Goldman Doe v. [read post]
