Search for: "STATE v FIELD"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 12,944
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
Twice, the Supreme Court has stated that it wishes to consider this question.The first occasion was in Marek v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:11 pm
In Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:37 pm
Blood Draw In Birchfield v. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
Detailed designs of the Saturn V rocket no longer exist, Drake said. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 12:58 pm
Dependable Sales & Service, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
" Unfortunately, it nevertheless happened.In 2012, the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice of Germany) handed down a decision on whether data storage media manufactured outside of, but imported into, Germany might infringe a video encoding patent, EP0630157 on "systems and methods for coding alternate fields of interlaced video sequences," a patent declared essential to the MPEG 2 video standard. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
The first published case to determine the admissibility of expert testimony regarding retrograde extrapolation was State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:10 pm
The first published case to determine the admissibility of expert testimony regarding retrograde extrapolation was State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:42 am
It would also vitiate the silly outcome U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:49 am
Facts: This case (Lough v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 8:34 pm
Abbott & Kristen Kortick Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:20 pm
In McCleery v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 10:07 am
In Fessenden v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
Sequenom owns what are arguably some of the broadest patents in the NIPT field. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
”). [3] Bench Book at 137; see also id. at 162. [4] Bench Book at 148. [5] Bench Book at 160. [6] Bench Book at 152. [7] Bench Book at 233, quoting Daubert v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 9:23 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Surrounded by 5-4 nail-biters, the 3-3-3 split generated by Virginia Uranium v. [read post]
