Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 3301 - 3320
of 13,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
Joshi, Margaret Keith, John R. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am
On December 8, 2017, the Court released two landmark judgments on this subject: R v Marakah[2] and R v Jones.[3] (Full disclosure: I was counsel to the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA), which intervened in both appeals.) [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
C. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm
But then there are two previous judgments on this issue, which the Upper Tribunal then turns to: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Nelson and Fife Council (2014) UKUT 525 (AAC) (our report here) and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Glasgow City Council and IB (2017) CSIH 35 (our report here). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am
By Marty Lederman and David LubanThis coming Friday, the Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to consider, at conference, the government’s nominal “petition for certiorari” in No. 17-654, Hargan v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Comment This decision was recently applied in Patel [2017] EWCA Civ 2028, where among other things the decision in Chavez-Vilchez (C-133/15, EU:C:2017:354, see here) was held not to alter the Zambrano doctrine and merely served as a reminder that the Zambrano principle had to be carefully applied focussing on whether the EU citizen child or dependant could remain in the UK in practice rather than in legal theory. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Applying Dano (C-333/13, EU:C:2014:2358), member states are not constrained by any EU treaty provision or legislative measure from deciding the level of benefits for Zambrano carers. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:59 am
Ryder LJ addressed the scope of the duty in R (C) [2016] EWCA Civ 707 and rejected the idea that it was unlawful for the local authority to set financial support by reference to levels of child benefit, or to amounts paid to asylum-seekers, rather than assessing their actual needs. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:18 pm
Ambrosini v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 12:47 pm
By Scott R. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am
C. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Court Reporter/Transcriber Timothy R. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Court Reporter/Transcriber Timothy R. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
C-48-CV-2017-833 (C.P. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In the 2013 case of Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
This broad protection of confidentiality is common to all states. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
§ 202.27(c), (d). [read post]
