Search for: "State v. David"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 14,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
Well done, LexisNexis Butterworths, for unearthing Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd and others [2007] EWHC 1251 (Ch), an obscure ruling by Mr Justice David Richards in the Chancery Division yesterday on a neat little passing-off point.Knight, a British citizen who lived in Australia, published three books in the UK between 1991 and 1996; each had the word 'Mythbusters' in its title. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
For the government were David V. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:49 pm
David Ingram has this post, with the above title, at BLT.She is right, to that extent, of course. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 5:12 am
by David S. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:37 am
" Moore v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm
On 21 March 2018 Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of AXB v BXA [2018] EWHC 588 (QB). [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
National Security Archive v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:51 am
The lower court held for the plaintiffs, under the “effects test” of Calder v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
By Jennifer Riley and David Ross Many thought that the U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:34 pm
In State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (David P. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 10:57 am
DAVID LERMAN, App. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:12 pm
By Mike Dorf In Tuesday's election, Iowa voters decided not to retain Chief Justice Marsha Ternus and Justices David Baker and Michael Streit of the state supreme court. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:40 am
Halderman (1981), and South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:43 pm
Lockwood v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:20 pm
The due process guarantees in the United States and New York Constitutions require that a defendant be afforded notice of the hearing to determine his or her risk level pursuant to SORA and a meaningful opportunity to respond to the risk level assessment (see § 168-n [3]; People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 136-140). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
In Jesinoski v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:19 pm
Here is their factsheet on Obama v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 10:00 pm
United States. [read post]