Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 19,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Coach v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am
Citigroup, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
The Société Anonyme Des Bains De Mer Et Du Cercle Des Étrangers À Monaco (mercifully abbreviated by the judge to 'SBM') owned the Casino de Monte-Carlo and enjoyed the state monopoly in relation to the provision of casino gaming services in Monaco. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 8:55 am
, Crabtree v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Following a statement from the Secretariat of State warning against unauthorised use and misuse of the image of Pope Francis, the Secretariat of State has hired a well-known law firm to monitor and repress any unauthorised third-party uses of the image of His Holiness. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Mark, 425 F.3d 505, 508-11 (8th Cir. 2005); Holm, 326 F.3d at 877-78; United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm
Koller, 472 U.S. 424, 430–31(1985) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); seealso Cohen v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
The case is Lopez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
In the appropriately named Liberty v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:08 pm
August 19, 2015); and Juice Generation Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
Kraemer has a lot to say about state enforcement of cultural beliefs; NYT v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
When it heard oral argument in Pearson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 3:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:13 am
LC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 5:44 pm
Counterfeit Chic provides a copy of the complaint in Victoria's Secret v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
He comments on the decision of Judge Hacon in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in William Mark Corporation & Another v Gift House International Ltd [2014] EWHC 2845 (IPEC). [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Given the high percentage of the market open to Doncaster Pharmaceuticals even where it could not use the REGURIN trade mark, SEP's exclusive use of the REGURIN mark in the UK did not contribute to the artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States for trospium chloride. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:29 am
In Chevron USA v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 8:05 am
Anderson v. [read post]