Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 57,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2013, 12:50 pm
That was an issue before the Business Court in Brady v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:17 am
" Citing Michaan v Gazebo Hort., Inc., 117 AD3d 692, the court said that in so doing, said the court, "the pleading must be liberally construed, the factual allegations must be deemed true, and the pleading party must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference. [read post]
22 Sep 2024, 7:05 am
Yet, in the 2023 case United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 6:09 am
To that end, it had previously decided to follow and adopt the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit in Mozes v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:57 am
A public employee’s retirement allowance paid by a public retirement system of this State ruled subject to the provisions of the Son of Sam Law New York State Off. of Victim Servs. v Raucci, 2012 NY Slip Op 04440, Appellate Division, Third Department The issue in this action: Does Retirement and Social Security Law §110* insulate the retirement benefits from a public retirement system of this State from “the broad reach of the Son of Sam Law,… [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 6:27 am
One of the doctors said that Whiteside had a 'severe mental disease or [defect]" and that she "did not appreciate the nature and quality of her actions. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:53 am
This agreement (entered into with the Secretary of State) assumes that judgment cannot be obtained against the driver if they cannot be identified and that therefore no liability can attach to their insurer. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:59 am
The Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:34 am
As I've said many times this election season, voter registration is the issue of 2008. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:34 am
As I've said many times this election season, voter registration is the issue of 2008. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:53 am
"Recognized" by the state as a mulatto? [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on December 12, 1975. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm
" The Appeals Court said, "The unilateral administrative order, we held, was addressed to this 'facility' within the State of Washington.We did not reach the question of whether Congress intended CERCLA to apply extraterritorially. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
"In Short v Board of Mgrs. of Nassau County Medical Center, 57 NY2d 399, the Court of Appeals ruled that where there is a "specific exemption from disclosure by State . . . statute," an agency is not required to disclose records with identifying details redacted. [read post]
