Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 5,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2015, 7:24 am
United States in an opinion joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Breyer and Sotomayor. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
In Henderson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:06 am
Happy labeling.The second decision today is an antitrust case, North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:06 am
Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined, in Yates v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:57 pm
From early on in Monday’s oral argument in Coleman-Bey v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:05 pm
On January 14, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inJennings v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:39 pm
Only Sotomayor has worked as a state-level prosecutor, in courts that prosecute traffic crimes, but that was only for a four-and-a-half period that ended thirty years ago. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:32 am
On January 14, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:58 am
” MLive covered the event and posted a short video of Justice Ginsburg discussing the Court’s 1996 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 am
After the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Warger v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 2:35 pm
” In Heien v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:47 am
In many cases, this would be true, but consider Justice Sotomayor's warning in her United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:43 am
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:35 am
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:20 am
Justice Ginsburg filed a separate concurring opinion, in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (M & G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:10 am
Presumably for these reasons, in the 13 years since we decided Penry v. [read post]
