Search for: "State v. True"
Results 3301 - 3320
of 21,805
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2009, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
We have two topics dominating today’s conversation on LXBN: the Supreme Court ruling in Christopher v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:12 am
He is serving consecutive life sentences for two related murder convictions in Pennsylvania state court. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:13 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:29 pm
Appellant entered into a stipulation of evidence with regard to the two prior felony convictions and pleaded true to both. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:55 am
Van Hoven v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
It is not often that the United States Supreme Court hears a family law case, so the Court's June, 2011, ruling in Turner v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
On October 13th, the Federal Circuit held in Solvay v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:19 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
The same is not true in NJ, as we see in: Cambridge Integrated Servs. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
In today’s case (Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm
See Johnson v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:26 am
The Defendant in Powell v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 8:46 am
Coda Dev. s.r.o. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:42 am
The Court of Appeal holds that state law unfair competition claims are preempted by the various federal regulations that govern the cable industry. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am
The defendant relied on the judgment of Lord Dyson in the Supreme Court case of R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2012] 1 AC 245 [101]), in which he disapproved the concept of “vindicatory damages”. [read post]
