Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 3321 - 3340 of 21,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2018, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Matter of McComb v Reasoner, 29 AD3d 795, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals has interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2)  to "require[ ] that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the governmental department's chain of command" and that the Court of Appeals has further interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2) to:1. require that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the governmental… [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:24 pm by robhealey
A DUI can be charged because of alcohol or drugs in a person’s body. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 6:42 am by Florian Mueller
C-333/21) several legal questions arising from the Super League's antitrust action against world soccer body FIFA and European soccer body UEFA. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 3:14 pm
Wisconsin Right to Life (06-969) and McCain v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Legal Beagle
  In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:09 am by Matrix Law
More specifically, does a doctor fall below the required standard of reasonable care by failing to make a patient aware of an alternative treatment in a situation where the doctor’s opinion was that the alternative treatment was not reasonable, and that opinion was supported by a responsible body of medical opinion (thus complying with what is sometimes referred to as the ‘professional practice test’ set out in Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1… [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 6:03 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
The Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, Ford Global Technologies, LLC (“Ford”), and against Plaintiff-Appellant, Automotive Body Parts Association (“Automotive”). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am by Florence Campbell Jones
Unwired Planet v Huawei and Conversant v Huawei and ZTE [2020] UKSC 37 Overview The principle issue before the Supreme Court was whether or not an English court was able and entitled to set the terms of a global portfolio FRAND (“fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory”) licence for patents declared by a standards body to be essential for the technology in question (“Standard Essential Patents” or “SEP”s) where all the parties had not… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:50 am by Matrix Law
The Appellant’s argument would confer rights on people all over the world to challenge the decision-making process of a public body exercising its functions, if the exercise of the public body’s functions affected them [64]. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of McDevitt v Suffolk County, 183 AD3d 826; Matter of Convers v County of Orange, 139 AD3d 1060; 9. [read post]