Search for: "High v State"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
In the High Court[1] Mr Justice Cooke referred to the case of Barker v Corus UK Ltd[2] and found that IEG’s liability in any given year of the policy was for the wrongful exposure to risk which was created in that year. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
See SEC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 2:23 pm
United States, 850 F.3d 1343, 1346 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
Mr Justice Arnold declined to make any such finding (para. 245) [Merpel: phew].This case in the High Court is unlikely to be the last relating to NIPT. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 11:46 am
For the first time outside of the originating case itself, a federal appeals court was called upon to apply the principles governing disgorgement in SEC enforcement actions established by the United States Supreme Court’s high-profile decision in Liu v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
For the first time outside of the originating case itself, a federal appeals court was called upon to apply the principles governing disgorgement in SEC enforcement actions established by the United States Supreme Court’s high-profile decision in Liu v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
¶44 (quoting State of Minn. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:52 am
R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2975 (21 December 2010) Mount v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 2974 (21 December 2010) C v R. [2010] EWCA Crim 2971 (17 December 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Cordant Group Plc, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills & Anor [2010] EWHC 3442 (Admin) (30 December 2010) Bovis Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2010]… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:46 am
Barnett v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
The parties entered into a Parenting Plan and Settlement Agreement which was adopted by a South Africa High Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:07 am
The High Court held that the Secretary of State had no power under section 5 to direct Ofcom not to comply with its duty under section 8(4) of the WTA 2006 to make regulations (exemption regulations) if Ofcom was satisfied that the conditions in section 8(5) were met. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 12:08 pm
Supreme court granted Microsoft's petition for a writ of certiorari in Microsoft Corp. v AT & T Corp., No. 05-1056, proceedings below, AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:13 am
., a rural enclave of about 17,000 people in the southwestern portion of the state. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:47 am
The post Pay-if-Paid v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:21 pm
Nor does it take into account the substantive weaknesses of the current duty to warn law in most states, with the high risks of false positives on liability. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:05 pm
At least since 1958’s NAACP v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:46 am
The Lakeland Ledger has, "Florida's High Court OKs Lethal Injections. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 4:03 pm
See Kilgore v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:20 pm
The High Court rejected this argument. [read post]
