Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 82,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Like any state without any state law specifically prohibiting them, bump stocks remain legal in Texas. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Like any state without any state law specifically prohibiting them, bump stocks remain legal in Texas. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:54 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Howard v. [read post]
13 Aug 2006, 10:07 pm
Williams v. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 11:09 am
Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:22 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 8:42 am
The post Sandy Hook v [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
” The court is like, so…? [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in in 1960 in Clay v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 10:14 am
The current state of the law on pre-nuptial agreements received a pretty thorough airing in the case of NG v KR (Pre-nuptial contract) [2008] EWHC 1532 (Fam). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Fund, Inc. v Gantt, 796 F Supp 681, 684 [ED NY 1992]). [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Although there are good arguments against such an expansive reading of the investment protection standards, the Eli Lilly dispute against Canada shows that such challenges are not just a theoretical option.Yes: treaty shopping is this cuteThe nature of UPC decisions makes such challenges all the more likely: As “court common to the Contracting Member States” and “part of their judicial system”, the UPC is – by virtue of the UPCA preamble –… [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:02 pm
Lessons and Takeaways from the Kanye v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
She was destitute but for her £50 per month state pension. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 4:09 pm
In Virginia v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 4:32 am
Like its federal counterpart, North Carolina Rule of Evidence 609(b) provides that Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than 10 years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of... [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 10:19 am
In its 1991 decision in Ylst v. [read post]
