Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 4,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
“Free Speech Today”, Lord Lester QC, Polish Yearbook of International Law, Vol 33 (2013), pp.129-144, SSRN. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 4:03 pm
United States Former Playboy model Karen McDougal filed her suit against Fox News in the Supreme Court of the state of New York. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In England, discussion has been dominated by the House of Commons report [1] and Lord Lester’s law reform bill [2]. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:01 am
The decision in Gordon v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
” The same point was made by Lord Justice Clerk Hope in Househill v Neilson, (1843) 1 WPC 673, 683, one of the earliest subject matter cases, concerning Neilson's invention of the hot-blast furnace, when he noted that the “main merit” of the invention may consist in “the discovery of the principle in science, or of the law of nature, stated in the patent. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
You can read the Lord Chancellor’s speech here. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:56 am
In Taylore v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:27 am
Lord Justice Davis observed: The importance of complying with s.149 is not to be understated. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
It also stated that Dr. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
In the case of Re S [2004] UKHL 47 Lord Steyn said: The interplay between articles 8 and 10 has been illuminated by the opinions in the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 WLR 1232. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
In R (Wright) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] UKHL 3, Baroness Hale noted that Article 8 had been held to include the right to establish and develop relationships with others. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
The case is styled Secretary of State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
(Lord Bingham, A-G’s Ref (No 5 of 2002), 2004) "this impenetrable statute … one of the most complex and unsatisfactory statutes currently in force. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This “opens up rather opportunistic and destructive battles on the validity of priority claims,” also referring to the Accord v RCT judgment of Mr Justice Birss. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
Then, that was a panel discussion that additionally included Lord Justice Floyd (also sitting on the UPC Rules of Procedure Committee), Alan Johnson (Bristows), and Richard Vary (Nokia). [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In Improver, Hoffman J. stated that the second Catnic question (the third Improver question) the question that raised the question of construction (as compared to the factual background against which the claim is to be construed) [read post]
