Search for: "People v J."
Results 3321 - 3340
of 7,244
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2016, 5:36 am
at 737 (Scalia, J. concurring). [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
There was a case comment on the Panopticon blog On Friday 8 April 2016, Mann J heard an application in the case of Various Claimants v MGN concerning CFAs and Article 10. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
People's exhibit 1B, a 30–round detachable magazine, was attached to the gun when taken into the officer's custody. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
Indeed, that is why all witnesses—lay or expert—are called: to get what they know about the case that other people do not. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:06 am
Bill William J. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 10:43 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Estate of Michael J. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm
The three trials are as follows: 5 April 2016, Umeyor v Ibe, 5 days; 18 April 2016, Undre v London Borough of Harrow, 2 days.; 23 May 2016, Theedom v Nourish Training, 3-4 days. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
It is wise to remember the words of Mason J in Commonwealth of Australia v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1980] HCA 44: “It can scarcely be a relevant detriment to the government that publication of material concerning its actions will merely expose it to public discussion and criticism. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
In particular, the legislature was clearly reacting to an ordinance enacted in February by the city of Charlotte, which added “lesbian, gay and transgender” to the list of protected traits for antidiscrimination purposes and provided that transgender people can use public restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:50 pm
J. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm
Its reliance on Vaudable [v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 2:10 pm
Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 582 (2008) (Scalia, J.). [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 4:58 am
As Elonora tell us over on the IPKat, the answer is unsurprisingly yes - and the use is not protected by the doctrine of fair use nor by 'safe harbour' - confirmed by Arnold J in his 174-paragraph judgment in England And Wales Cricket Board Ltd & Another v Tixdaq Ltd & Another [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch).The German head of digital-economy policy at the European Commission, Günther Oettinger, is considering rolling out German and Spanish… [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 11:35 am
Hoover (J. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:26 am
Ringhand is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and J. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
” Noel J. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
Stephen J. [read post]
