Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 3321 - 3340 of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
Forty-six states, the District of Columbia, and the United States all provide some form of DNA testing. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am by Ronald Mann
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term:  former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Eric Goldman
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) applied this provision when it refused Steve Elster’s application to register the phrase “Trump Too Small” as a trademark for shirts. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:58 am by Lyle Denniston
United States) that also had cut back on the concept of exclusion. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Eric Segall
Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett were all lawyers who worked on the GOP side in Bush v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia have barred such inventions from being patented. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Mark Ashton
With a few exceptions the Supreme Courts of the United States both in Washington and 50 state capitals are courts of “limited jurisdiction. [read post]
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 7:56 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Almost every state in the United States has laws known as “parental responsibility laws” and imposes some degree of civil liability on parents for torts committed by their children. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Barrett’s willingness to look past possible abuse of discretion and violation of due process decried by the dissenting judges echoes Chief Justice John Roberts’s deferential reasoning in Trump v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 9:57 am
Millett, Assistant to the Solicitor General, argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae in support of respondent. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 2:01 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareThe Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday in Van Buren v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Curtis law firm bills itself as "the only law firm[s] in the United States" to concentrate their practice on "representing clients injured by attorneys. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 7:21 am
Englert gave part of his argument time to Gregory Garre of the United States Solicitor General's office, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the state of Kentucky. [read post]