Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 3,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
In DYSTAR TEXTILFARBEN GMBH v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
That was the ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp). [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:41 am
Despite their high-mindedness, the authors’ argument becomes muddled when it comes to conflating scientific objectivity with subjective values: “In the past, scientists and philosophers have argued that the best way to maintain science’s objectivity and the public’s trust is to draw a sharp line between science and human values or policy (Longino 1990). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:33 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:12 am
For example, in Dymow v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
In Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:34 am
See Knitwaves Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Travis v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Taylor v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
The case is Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
(Follow the links for Part I, Part II, Part III and Part IV.) [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:06 pm
Supreme Court in 1964 in McLaughlin v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
In a recent case, EEOC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
[54] New Classic Cases – Falstaff The new Guidelines cite U.S. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:04 pm
In Schroer v. [read post]
