Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 3321 - 3340 of 15,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2019, 8:22 am by Giles Peaker
If a policy amounts to indirect discrimination against group E, I do not consider that it is an answer for the policy maker to say that it has considered groups A, B, C and D. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 2:06 pm
All of those other states say that, yep, the landowner can be liable in such a setting, even in states that have their own analogue to Section 846.But not here in California. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID… [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 3:35 am by Susan Brenner
For that answer, we must look to § 1028(d)(7)'s introductory paragraph, as well as the examples provided in subsections (A) through (C). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Disease Burden from Viral Hepatitis A, B, and C in the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Disease Burden from Viral Hepatitis A, B, and C in the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Processing an application for accidental disability retirementMagistro v DiNapoli, 2016 NY Slip Op 05893, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentBodenmiller v DiNapoli, 2016 NY Slip Op 05894, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentMembers of the New York State Policemen's and Firemen's Retirement System injured on the job and and as a result are "physically or mentally incapacitated for performance of duty” may apply for an accidental… [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Tonight, the Ninth Circuit issued an unanimous ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
Noting that the city’s program met the exception in Sec. 553.226(b)(1), because it was required by state law when considering the employees’ actual duties and not just their titles, the appeals court found that they, in fact, devoted half of their time as paramedics after they obtained their certification (Misewicz v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]