Search for: "State v. L. B."
Results 3321 - 3340
of 6,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2023, 4:04 am
In Devon Energy Production Company, LP et al v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
L. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
L. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
United States Envt’l Protection Agency, 4 F.Supp.2d 435 (M.D.N.C. 1998), vacated by, 313 F.3d 852 (4th Cir. 2002) Tocolytics – Medical Malpractice Hurd v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:21 pm
L. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:00 am
Salzburg, Wyoming Attorney General; Terry L. [read post]
3 May 2022, 12:06 pm
State law governs the administration of a will. [read post]
25 May 2016, 1:39 pm
Corbett, Interim Dean, Frank L. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
As relevant here, the current version of the prohibition states:(A) Subject to the exceptions provided in part (B), whoever knowingly enters a sensitive place while carrying a firearm shall be guilty of a felony punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 and imprisonment for up to five years. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 3:07 pm
Attachment and garnishment -- Cook v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:35 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 12:30 am
A602 Cahill -- Relates to permitting all state-paid uniformed court officers to execute bench warrants Same as S 6724 BLURB : CP L. bench warrants; ct officersLast Act: 02/01/10 REFERRED TO CODESA8530E DenDekker (MS) -- Entitles defendants charged with an offense the ability to telephone any number located in the United States or Puerto Rico Same as S 5688-D BLURB : CP L. lng dst phn cl Last Act: 02/01/10 amended on third reading 8530eS2660B VOLKER --… [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
Simon.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
After Jorge L. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Vázquez (Georgetown), Ingrid B. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:09 pm
L. [read post]
30 May 2010, 10:16 am
Copyright 2010 Fred L. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
WildTangent then moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:11 pm
VSI Int'l, Inc., 174 F.3d 1308, 1331 (Fed. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
