Search for: "State v. Lowe"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 9,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2007, 8:23 am
Leroy Carhart in Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:26 pm
Harper (concerning the controversial “independent state legislature” theory of election law), United States v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 6:15 am
| Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar | Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Absent a “a reasonably high degree of probability that the presumed fact follows from those proved directly” (People v Leyva, 38 NY2d 160, 166), “the danger . . . is that of logical gaps – that is, subjective inferential links based on probabilities of low grade or insufficient degree – which undetected, elevate coincidence and, therefore, suspicion into permissible inference” (People v Cleague, 22 NY2d 363). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Absent a “a reasonably high degree of probability that the presumed fact follows from those proved directly” (People v Leyva, 38 NY2d 160, 166), “the danger . . . is that of logical gaps – that is, subjective inferential links based on probabilities of low grade or insufficient degree – which undetected, elevate coincidence and, therefore, suspicion into permissible inference” (People v Cleague, 22 NY2d 363). [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:52 pm
There is a curious irony to Judge Weinstein's decision in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:57 am
The PCT’s policy for patients with GID stated that “cosmetic” breast surgery was a low priority, as there was “no evidence that [it] will resolve psychological symptoms, only which arise from the size and or shape of the breast. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
(Poet, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:14 am
In a footnote in their opinion in Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:47 am
Jackson v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:16 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm
Today there will be a key hearing, styled as a "case management conference", before Judge Lucy Koh, relating to the first of two Apple v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 7:12 am
Boessenecker v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 1:33 pm
” Suffolk Techs., LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 12:49 pm
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 2:42 pm
This week, EFF, along with EPIC and NACDL, filed an amicus brief in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
Cooper v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:43 am
The case is Nielson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:58 am
In Vance v. [read post]
