Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 8,683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2019, 7:49 am
Federal employment anti-discrimination law identifies five protected categories: race, color, religion, national origin, and sex. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:44 pm
The column is notionally on the McConnell-Grimes Senate race in Kentucky, but the subtext is brought to the fore in the conclusion: The backdrop of this election is a profound gloom about the state of our continuing national experiment in self-government. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:37 am
This has potential to be one of those cases.The case is Harge v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
A recent federal court case, Adams v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
United States" is now up on SSRN. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:14 am
In this case, no.The case is Asabor v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 12:30 am
"Also in the Times is a review of Speak Now: Marriage Equality on Trial: The Story of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
In Minnick v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
His book, M’Culloch v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 10:00 am
See Bailey v. [read post]
20 May 2025, 8:42 am
United States, Kasdin Mitchell in Bowe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am
In Monasky v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:08 am
Although opponents of disparate impact focus on Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:18 pm
Republicans should pray for Haley to stay in this race until all fifty states have voted in the Republican primaries and caucuses. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:30 pm
In Buck v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 11:22 am
The plaintiffs were denied coverage for medically necessary gender-affirming medical care for their gender dysphoria, a DSM-V condition, but these same treatments are covered by the state for other medically necessary reasons not based on sex. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:21 pm
The new case is Simmons, et al., v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 3:06 pm
My colleague Professor Stone characterizes, in his recent post, the five Justices -- who are Roman Catholics -- who were in the majority in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
