Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 3321 - 3340
of 6,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Similarly, some states have runoff elections or ranked-choice voting (as in Maine). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:29 pm
Supp. 2d 109, 115 (D.D.C. 2004) (citing United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
Those objectives, then, are left to the discretionary choices of that apparatus--subject to overarching rules and modalities of coordination and requests for legislative action constituting additional authority for administrative supervision--to flesh out and implement. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
United States Patent No. 3,178,242 (filed May 13, 1963) (“Ellis”) discloses a beverage carton with a removable corner and a finger opening(...)So let’s be clear what claim 2 is about. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 1:39 am
Apple points to a Second Circuit decision (Lotes Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:15 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:53 am
Lynch v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 2:39 pm
Touring the publicly accessible portion of the old parliament building, restored to its proper place as the seat of national government, helps even a casual visitor understand how a united, democratic Germany fulfills through living architecture the twin promises that the Reichstag has made: Dem Deutschen Völke and Der Bevölkerung. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:22 am
United States and Setser v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm
See Irby v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:15 am
" (Ehrlich v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:53 am
It's a 5-4 decision, thus leaving the rights protected by our Constitution in the hands of a single individual, Justice Anthony Kennedy, whose individual views more than any other dictate the fundamental law of the United States of America. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
" In a question certified to the state's highest court by a federal appellate panel (the United States Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit), the New York State Court of Appeals was asked to determine the "test" to be applied when an employee (subject to a CNC) is involuntarily forced to leave a company. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the highlight of the week on the oral argument front: United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:54 am
Most notably, in Parents Involved v. [read post]
