Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 3321 - 3340 of 9,860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2019, 8:34 am by Lev Sugarman
Rachael Hanna summarized pre-sentencing hearings in the United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Morgan Kousser, and Orville Vernon Burton in Nairne v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
Forty-six states, the District of Columbia, and the United States all provide some form of DNA testing. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Eric Goldman
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) applied this provision when it refused Steve Elster’s application to register the phrase “Trump Too Small” as a trademark for shirts. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am by Ronald Mann
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term:  former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:58 am by Lyle Denniston
United States) that also had cut back on the concept of exclusion. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:00 am by Eric Segall
Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett were all lawyers who worked on the GOP side in Bush v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am by Dennis Crouch
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia have barred such inventions from being patented. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Mark Ashton
With a few exceptions the Supreme Courts of the United States both in Washington and 50 state capitals are courts of “limited jurisdiction. [read post]
On March 22, 2017, we blogged about the importance of the United States Supreme Court’s looming decision in Murr v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 7:56 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Almost every state in the United States has laws known as “parental responsibility laws” and imposes some degree of civil liability on parents for torts committed by their children. [read post]