Search for: "X, Y "
Results 3321 - 3340
of 4,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 3:11 am
The Court concluded, unanimously, that the decision to take a blood test and photograph the second applicant against her parents’ express instructions gave rise to an interference with her right to respect for her private life and, in particular, her right to physical integrity (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1985, § 22, Series A no. 91; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, §§ 61 and 63, ECHR 2002-III; Y.F. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 11:20 pm
That is if single author A publishes one work in journal X, and then author A publishes the identical work in journal Y without referencing the prior work in journal X, that is a form of plagiarism. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 9:23 pm
(The chart gives the R^2 figure that reports the degree to which the y-axis variable here (number of depositories) is predicted by the x-axis variable (year). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm
It's noteworthy that the record analyzed by the [Fifth Circuit] doesn't seem to include any examples of direct, unequivocal threats, such as "If you don't take down X, I will inflict punishment Y. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
What difference does it make if my DNA has two X chromosomes or and X & Y chromosome? [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 4:40 am
Others would be in an “x” category for which few license exceptions would be available. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
long x 6? [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
There has to be some particular reason why X should be held to have assumed responsibility for protecting Y from Z. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
Roberts Jr. was particularly dismissive of what he called — rather oddly — “sociological gobbledygook” in the challengers’ arguments: [If] you’re the intelligent man on the street and the Court issues a decision, and let’s say the Democrats win, and that person will say: Well, why did the Democrats win And the answer is going to be because EG was greater than 7 percent, where EG is the sigma of party X wasted votes minus the sigma of party… [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
However, the license was subject to two exceptions, namely to: use the polygons (including the associated geometry, namely x,y co-ordinates) for a purpose other than personal, non-commercial use or commercial or non-commercial use within your organisation; or sub-license, distribute, sell or make available the polygons (including the associated geometry, namely x,y co-ordinates) to third parties. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:09 pm
Chief Judge Sargus apparently was oblivious to the difference between “X causes Y” and “X may increase the risk of Y. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
The term “SRE” expenditures means research or experimental expenditures that are paid or incurred by the taxpayer during a tax year in connection with the taxpayer’s trade or business.[18] The TCJA removed the SRE expense election and instead required SREs to be charged “to capital account” and amortized over either 5 years (for domestic research) or 15 years (for foreign research).[19] Taxpayers should therefore carefully review (x) whether they have an SRE… [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
Given that an agent has end X, it is rational for the agent to engage in action Y, only if Y will lead to X. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
This is why we’re doing X, Y, or Z from an organizational perspective. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
” On the federal budget, they are not willing to say, “If you give us $X of spending cuts, we’ll give you $Y of tax increases,” no matter how much bigger X is than Y. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:48 pm
Given that an agent has end X, it is rational for the agent to engage in action Y, only if Y will lead to X. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:20 am
" Then everyone spends the next decade litigating whether X, Y, or Z makes any difference. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:31 pm
Given that an agent has end X, it is rational for the agent to engage in action Y, only if Y will lead to X. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:56 am
Ergo, if plaintiff’s shares are currently worth “x”, but defendants’ improper actions caused the shares to lose “y” in value, the could would award plaintiff “x” plus “y”. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Given that an agent has end X, it is rational for the agent to engage in action Y, only if Y will lead to X. [read post]
