Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 3341 - 3360 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
The ARB dismissed the petition, noting that the ALJ’s decision would be the final decision of the Department in the matter. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In principle this Decision also applies to the present case; however, it has to be taken into account that, according to general intertemporal principles, the correct course of the proceedings before the RS has to be assessed on the basis of the legal situation existing at the relevant point in time (in this context, see decisions G 1/07 [1.1] and J 10/07 [1.2]). [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Boaz, No. 07-3918 Conviction for firearms possession is affirmed where: 1) district court did not err in determining defendant's prior Arkansas felony conviction qualified as a predicate offense under 18 U.S.C. sec. 922(g)(1); and 2) preponderance of the evidence was the correct standard for determining that defendant had three predicate violent felonies for purposes of 18 U.S.C. sec. 924(e). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a unanimous 29-page opinion authored by Associate Justice Carol Corrigan, and filed on March 30, 2017, the California Supreme Court held the City of Newport Beach’s EIR for a large mixed-use development project proposed on a 400-acre coastal zone site failed to comply with CEQA. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
 Saad Siddiqui Team Members: Zach Benoit (2L), Michael Pesin (2L), Debbie Robbins (3L), Hanna Shoshany (3L) The competition involved a defendant, Melbourne G. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
§ §341, 343(b), 343(c), 343(d), 343(e), 343(f), 343(g), 343(h), 343(i), 343(k), 343(q), or 343(r)) relating to food.Drug and device companies don't have that problem, which - as we explained in our prior post - is why the California Supreme Court had to jump through all the hoops it did to avoid preemption.So with this point in mind, we look at the defendants' certiorari petition in Albertsons/Farm Raised Salmon. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 3:55 pm by Michael Lowe
Code §71.0221(c) (emphasis added): A casual acquaintanceship or ordinary fraternization in a business or social context does not constitute a “dating relationship” under Subsection (b). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
As noted in yesterday's post and the comments thereto, one purpose of virtual reality is to escape from a less-than-ideal reality. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:55 am by Owiso Owiso
Second, the involvement of Eritrean forces in support of the Federal Government further complicates matters. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm by vforberger
§ 108.04(11)(g)2 (setting forth a claimant’s duty of care to provide accurate and complete responses to Department inquires). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
This update includes the following: CFM Items Q4 Matters Annual Compliance & Other Items Annual Fund Matters Annual Management Company Matters Notable Regulatory & Other Items from 2023 Compliance Calendar **** CFM Items We are pleased to welcome Jon Tong as a Senior Associate in our Funds practice group. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 2:46 am by Editor Charlie
  But then they switch to the active voice: “We respond expeditiously”—a phrase directly from the safe harbor provisions of the Copyright Act (especially 512(c)(1)(A)(iii) and 512(c)(1)(C) for those who are reading along)—“to requests [i.e., DMCA notices] to remove such content from our services” and “have been improving our procedures over time” the most prominent of which is ContentID on YouTube that figures large… [read post]