Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 3341 - 3360 of 37,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 6:36 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit last week in LFP Publishing Group d/b/a Hustler Magazine v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:26 pm
US High Court Rejects Review Of Apollo Group Securities Case, Wall Street Journal, March 22, 2011 Apollo Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 11:48 am by Ronald Mann
That case should be a relief; after considering the weighty constitutional concerns summarized in my preview in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 6:20 am
The Court of Appeals found; "It is clear that the holding in Samples is directed to the question of what damages an injured employee may recover from his own or his employer's UIM carrier; it neither addresses nor changes the law regarding an employer's subrogation rights as set out in State Farm v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Inwood North Professional Group-Phase I, 747 S.W.2d 373 (Tex. 1988),termination is a justified remedy when the landlord breaches the commercial lease. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:10 pm by Kathryn Fenderson Scott
Lewis based his ruling on an analysis of the state’s no-fault law dating back to 1974, when the Florida Supreme Court in a landmark case [Lasky v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 8:01 am by Sean Quirk
Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group and the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group conducted a joint exercise as an Expeditionary Strike Force in the South China Sea. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 6:40 am
CNW Group states, The suit claims that the Defendants conspired to inflate the price of their products by 5% or more at least three times during the Class Period, in violation of a variety of statutes including the Competition Act, and the various provincial Consumer Protection Acts. [read post]
11 May 2012, 12:18 pm by BuckleySandler
The opinion was prepared in response to a request by consumer groups concerned by court decisions, beginning with Ford Motor Credit Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 6:12 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Monica Corker, IAT Insurance Group Specialty, and Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 4:21 pm
Static Control Components/The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. [read post]