Search for: "In re S. H." Results 3341 - 3360 of 9,909
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
In re Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc., Serial No. 85164876 (May 11, 2016) [precedential]. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:50 am
Qu’en fut-il des enseignements pratiques, organisés par les administrations étatiques des affaires étrangères ? [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
If you’ve lived in Boston or Cambridge, you’re familiar with the phrase “dropping the H-Bomb”. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
If you’ve lived in Boston or Cambridge, you’re familiar with the phrase “dropping the H-Bomb”. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If you’re going to have a registration system, it’s the gov’t administering and not speaking. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 6:47 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
It makes no difference, the Sixth Circuit reasoned, that § 3583(h) says courts may impose a term of supervised release following re-imprisonment. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 3:59 am by Tammy Binford
Review antidiscrimination and antiharassment policies (with an attorney’s help) to make sure they’re enforceable and say what’s necessary. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Chris Mirasola
” Finally, an unnamed US official told reporters that China deployed a H-6 strategic bomber to fly around the Spratly Islands last weekend. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm by Jane Chong
The recipient IC element must ensure it protects the raw SIGINT in accordance with the Fourth Amendment and other laws, must not use the intelligence it acquires "for the purpose of affecting the political process in the United States," must notify NSA of mission changes, must limit access to appropriate personnel, must protect auditing records, must use "reasonable measures" to mark those SIGINT files “reasonably believed” to contain U.S. person information, must… [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:06 am
  Prior to KFF, we'll offer a tour of our historic Richard H. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  The court did, however, hold that the receptor thresholds could be used under certain circumstances, consistent with the California Supreme Court’s ruling, such as: (1) when the effect is ‘exacerbated’ by the project; (2) when a lead agency wishes to use such information for its own evaluation purposes; and (3) for those certain projects specifically identified in CEQA that call for an analysis of impacts on future users (see airports (PRC § 21096), school… [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
It’s that time of year when you’re thinking about doing a Backdoor Roth IRA. [read post]