Search for: "Law v. United States"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 62,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
Not the way I would have done it, but we all have our own style.On the same conference list, presenting largely the same issues, is United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 8:57 pm
Both acts require the use of steel made in the United... [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:00 am
The Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 5:22 am
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
Fischer, 635 F.3d 336, and United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act) Simmons v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
***Under the facts of this case and the applicable federal law, Petitioner has shown that the decision of the Supreme Court of Florida was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
New York-New Jersey Port Authority held subject to New York State's laws involving health and safety
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
New York-New Jersey Port Authority held subject to New York State's laws involving health and safety
20 Jul 2020, 3:58 am
"The court explained that the "express purpose of Labor Law §740 is to protect public health and safety" and as it stated in Rosario v Port Auth. of N.Y. and N.J., 179 AD3d 516, "[t]he Compact Clause of the United Stated Constitution is not implicated by the application of such New York workplace safety statutes to [a] Port Authority work site located in New York. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:14 am
The 14th Amendment states that: “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 5:17 am
Garland (6-3) "Federal law provides that noncitizens convicted of an “aggravated felony” are removable from the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court held in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:12 am
”) State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm
(Tribal Court Jurisdiction; Indian Child Welfare Act) United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 10:07 am
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution includes both an establishment clause and a free exercise clause. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:49 am
State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:49 am
The new policy announced by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement will essentially allow undocumented immigrants to remain in the United States as long as they do not have a criminal history. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 8:31 am
Facts: This case (Cope v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:22 am
“Last December the European Court of Human Rights decided in S and Marper v The United Kingdom that the retention by the State of DNA profiles is a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
