Search for: "P. v. Long" Results 3341 - 3360 of 7,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2016, 3:50 am by Jan von Hein
The latest issue of the “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)” features the following articles: P. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am by Schachtman
However, if we recognize that 5% is not a magic line, then the choice between one tail and two is less important—as long as the choice and its effect on the p-value are made explicit. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
The former had been held to lack inventive step by the judge in the main judgment at first instance and, to cut a long story short, the Court of Appeal agreed. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
Ayerst Laboratories, Inc., 607 P.2d 1339, 1349-50 (Kan. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm by Guest Author
Yet for a long time this “puzzle” has been largely reserved to academic debates.[2] Indeed, case law addressing challenges to agency adjudication on Article III or Seventh Amendment grounds has been sparse.[3] Until recently. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:56 am by Unknown
According to the rulemaking petition, the soon-to-be-argued Supreme Court case Slack Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
  As an aside, I should note that this is a long blog post because the opinion is, as lawyers say, very “fact-specific”, i.e., there are a lot of issues of fact that came up in the case. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Finally, it is important to note that while financial backing or marketing insights may be essential for the success of a business venture those do not, by themselves, lead one to be an inventor. _______________________________ [1] RSC 1985, c P-4. [2] Weatherford Canada Ltd v Corlac Inc, 2010 FC 602, aff’d 2011 FCA 228 at para 104. [3] Weatherford Canada Ltd v Corlac Inc, 2010 FC 602 at para 238, aff’d 2011 FCA 228 at para 99, 95 CPR (4th) 101 (var’d on… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Elliott on Roads and Streets, §§ 479, 480; Dillon on Municipal Corporations, 5th Edition, § 1407, p. 2459, note; Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, 7th Edition, p. 736; In re Dassler, 35 Kansas, 678; State v. [read post]