Search for: "People v High"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 15,042
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 7:02 am
The intention of the patented invention is to enable an aeroplane passenger to plug his or her personal electronic device directly into a high voltage AC power supply in his or her seat, whilst maintaining a high level of safety. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:55 pm
Sometimes the conversation online is a high-minded one, with students “participating in issue- or cause-focused groups, encouraging other people to take action on issues they care about, and finding information on protests or rallies. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
Oh, my goodness, some — some people thought that he was criminally irresponsible, and others thought he was a genius. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
“[A] man of high ambitions … must face the loneliness of original work. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
As this term’s decision in Espinoza v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:35 am
Trump v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:53 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6100000&SeqEnd=8350000Read More [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am
Like all elements from written works, character designs cannot be protected as independent works, because one written work derives only one copyright title [Chao v Qujing Cigarette Factory, case reference: High People’s Court of Yunnan Province (2003) Yunnan High Minsanzhongzi No. 16 (in Chinese). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
In other words, maybe the consumer buys BRAINSTRONG anyway, even if she knows there is a high chance it won't work or even a small chance it might hurt her.My favorite example of the "materiality" limitation on the deceptiveness bar is the GLASS WAX trademark upheld in Gold Seal Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
”; Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 5:04 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
I understand that different people, on different sides of debates, see the issues very differently. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:24 pm
Supreme Court ruling on DACA, Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
[Yesterday was pro-Chief Justice Roberts day on CNN. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:59 pm
It opens up space for chaotic, exciting new innovations, and erodes the high walls that monopolies build to protect themselves. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:21 am
v=F69DQupMiZM (the above is a clip of the Homer moment that I’m thinking of, but my embed function is a bit glitchy so you may need to click and view it on the youtube site to watch). [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm
As this Commission recognized in Public Admonition of Letsinger (Ind. 1997): "Judges are not forbidden from making public comments; in fact, they should be encouraged to engage in temperate and judicious speech on any subject, so long as the speech does not compromise the high ethical standards by which judges, unlike other citizens, are held. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm
(That case, United States v. [read post]
