Search for: "People v Levelle" Results 3341 - 3360 of 12,300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm by David Cole
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM As a candidate, Trump promised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Ronald Collins
Robin: While I was writing this book, I constantly had people, the most well meaning, liberal-minded people, tell me who Thomas is and what he thinks. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:54 am by David Oscar Markus
”; the pin cite in the citations on page fourteen, lines one and six should be “589–90”; the quotation on page seventeen, line five should read: “Miami-Dade County and/or Public Health Trust”; the quotation on page eighteen, line nineteen should read: “[it] can rise to the level . . . [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Excerpt: Abstract & Part V: At Ground Level: Themes from the Study[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Pulat Yunusov
In a 2014 Ontario Superior Court case (Waisberg v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:03 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3472464 “In the wake of the 2013 United States Supreme Court decision of McBurney v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
The following speakers have already committed to speak at the conference: ▪ Eyal Benvenisti, University of Cambridge ▪ Heike Krieger, Freie Universität Berlin ▪ Silja Vöneky, University of Freiburg Call for papers: We now call upon scholars to consider contributing a paper to the conference. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Michael Geist: Ok, so we’re talking about a really broad range, not just at the federal level, but at the provincial level as well. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:18 am by Michael Lowe
Sometimes, just possessing a piece of property can get you arrested in Texas if it is an “illegal weapon” under the law. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am by Jonathan Shaub
If you think of a “legal” doctrine as a rule according to which people adhere their behavior and pursuant to which parties can resolve disputes, executive privilege has not been a legal doctrine at all. [read post]