Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 3341 - 3360 of 6,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
Any rights in one’s name do not overcome a conflict with prior rights of another: “use of one's surname is not a ‘defense’ to a trademark infringement action” Sardi's Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
There's No Such Thing http://t.co/EuVThkZZDb -> European Commission takes another leap to boost cloud computing http://t.co/XsCrOPmFq6 -> CASL is coming and it’s going to affect your business http://t.co/NVYdMHXOpE -> Mobilicity sale denied a 2nd time by Ottawa http://t.co/5tO21syNzX -> NSA Spying Allegations Put Google on Hot Seat in Brazil http://t.co/Bnjwy6VOWC -> IP Osgoode » Shiver Me Timbers! [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
For example, it will be exciting to see how JustFab and ShoeDazzle create a cohesive market for online shoppers as they combine JustFab’s personalized shopping experience with ShoeDazzle’s amazing sales. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:15 am by Schachtman
  See “Milward’s Singular Embrace of Comment C (May 4, 2013). [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 5:11 am by Woodrow Pollack
Swap Shop, Inc., No. 12-60400-CIV, 2013 WL 4407064 * 3 holding that “‘Defendant’s corporate federal income tax returns are relevant to the issue of statutory damages under section 504(c)(1) in a copyright infringement action. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 3:36 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
UIPR 469 (1994) Archivado en: César Vázquez Morales [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am by Devlin Hartline
Not All Copyright Owners Can Exploit The Copyright By way of context, the Ninth Circuit’s en banc majority opinion in Silvers v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/l2MXeuR5q1 -> Newbury v Sun Microsystems Ltd – when is a settlement offer binding? [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm
Category: 101   By: Eric Paul Smith, Contributor    TitleUltramercial, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
Admissibility under Henderson v Henderson Evidence concerning the genesis of Montex’s DIESEL trade mark was admissible. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As held in the case of Petrossian v Grossman, the burden of proving entitlement to disqualifying opposing counsel rests on the movant. [read post]