Search for: "Sample v. State"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 4,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 9:28 am
Additional Resources: David v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 12:32 pm
§ 13-3925 Birchfield v. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:35 pm
The recent case is State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 2:06 am
Perhaps the best index of his tastes is his enthusiasm for two men who have written about India--V. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 2:00 am
This case came a few years before the electronic discovery juggernaut, Zubulake v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:20 pm
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 10:08 am
First, the end of August ushered in a hefty $5.7 million civil penalty against a major retailer in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:24 am
The Court’s decision in ATSC Aviation, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:37 pm
Keith Bowles is serving a 15 year to life sentence imposed by an Ohio state court. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
For example, in 2009, Florida’s 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled in Sundlin v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
Kim, Maximilian Muhn, and Valeri V. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 9:31 am
In an earlier paper, Gibson, Caldeira, and Spence determined that the Supreme Court may have actually enhanced its institutional legitimacy after deciding Bush v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
The Brady rule resulted from a 1963 Supreme Court case, aptly named Brady v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 11:49 am
Additional Resources: David v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Metts v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:30 pm
The following excerpts are just a sampling of his criticism. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
And Kara Bruce’s and Alex Sickler’s co-authored essay reviews the state of FDCPA litigation in chapter 13 cases in light of Midland Funding v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm
First, pollsters use much smaller samples on a regular basis. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
In Goodwin v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) the Supreme Court upheld British Columbia’s ARP scheme as valid provincial law that does not unlawfully invade federal criminal law power or contravene section 11 of the Charter, but the Court also ruled that the seizure of a breath sample using an approved screening device (ASD) under the scheme as previously administered was an unreasonable seizure under section 8 of the Charter. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:54 am
In Blessings, Inc. d/b/a Blessings Seafood v. [read post]
