Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan"
Results 3341 - 3360
of 3,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
Even with stellar Supreme Court advocates like Lisa Blatt, Kathleen Sullivan and Allyson Ho, the vast majority of argument slots are still filled by male attorneys. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 9:23 am
(R.A.V. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
Brendan Sullivan’s virulent, scorched-earth defense of Oliver North during the televised Iran/Contra hearings is the exception that proves the rule: in addition to the fact that Colonel North as a client offered his lawyers advantages and disadvantages peculiar only to Colonel North, Sullivan made a considered tactical decision that high-profile aggression was the appropriate tack in that particular public theater. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Sullivan, 246 F. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
Brief research* has disclosed that several recent opinions of the COA have referenced or relied on NPFs: NFP citing NFP: Mitchell v. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:19 am
That case, Emess Capital v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
I recently received this memo from our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell detailing the proposed rule and its implications. [read post]
27 Oct 2024, 12:50 pm
” Judge Mendez cited to the US Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm
Stateside, the first three chapters examine how the fundamental US/UK differences in attitude towards freedom of speech came about – principally with the bell tolling for reputational rights in 1964 when the case of New York Times v Sullivan (an index stalwart for practitioners) decided that, where allegations concern official conduct, a public official cannot bring a defamation claim unless able to show ‘actual malice’: the defamation law equivalent of the… [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
As the facts of the DuPont v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:43 pm
Sullivan, say -- with the highly reticulated material of modern First Amendment decisions. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am
You don't have to articulate an administerable standard any more than you did in Bush v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm
However, the products continue to be painted in a faux-Indigenous style and, as Gabrielle Sullivan, CEO of the Indigenous Arts Code notes, currently “there is no law in Australia that says you can’t make fake art and you can’t misappropriate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture”. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am
See, e.g., Lugosch v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:57 pm
(See New York Times v. [read post]
