Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 3341 - 3360 of 8,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 4:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner represented to the Court that he could not afford the international travel and that he would be unable to obtain a visa to enter the United States by the hearing. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner’s counsel demonstrated the necessity of the long distance telephone calls, having included line items indicating the necessity of calling the United States State Department, an attorney in Mexico, the Mexican consulate, and Petitioner concerning the return of DFB to Mexico. [read post]
8 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
United States 16-1063 Issues: (1) Whether the government violated the petitioners’ Fifth Amendment rights by using their post-arrest, pre-Miranda v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 11:00 am by Megan Geuss
Pruitt sued the EPA more than a dozen times under the Obama Administration, challenging policy from the Clean Power Plan to the Waters of the United States rule. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:01 am by Matthew T. Giardina
Clark’s illness was caused by exposure to asbestos during his service in the United States Air Force as well as his employment with an aircraft manufacturer. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:58 pm by Jeffrey May
The plaintiffs are attempting to allege that Rabobank used exclusive dealing arrangements—with more than 50 percent of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustees in the United States—to eliminate the bank’s need to compete for over a billion dollars of banking deposits of Chapter 7 estates. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-7314. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:59 am by Kate Howard
United States 16-7314 Issues: (1) Whether law-enforcement [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 pm by Amy Howe
The 53-year-old came to the United States as a refugee in 2000, fleeing ethnic strife in the former Yugoslavia. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" However, the Circuit Court dismissed this contention, explaining that such a claim "is not cognizable in a civil case," citing United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, another civil procedure case involving a court’s specific jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants sued by out-of-state plaintiffs. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
The Supreme Court justices in the Youngstown steel seizure case faced the question of the emergency authority of the President of the United States, not of the person of Harry S. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]