Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 3341 - 3360 of 7,529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Chris Castle
ASCAP must now license both the ASCAP and BMI share and can collect for both writers, because “[u]nder the copyright law, joint authors of a single work are treated as tenants-in-common, so ‘[e]ach co-owner may thus grant a nonexclusive license to use the entire work without the consent of other co-owners, provided that the licensor accounts for and pays over to his or her co-owners their pro-rata shares of the proceeds. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm by Ron Coleman
 Now, we have all done this research, and in the Southern District alone there is a case standing for the proposition for and against every conceivable amount of time you like as being too much delay, not enough delay, and ju-u-u-u-u-ust right. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 3:43 am by SHG
Rather, it comes from the Supreme Court’s 1993 ruling in Harris v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The decision in Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U) [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] suggests that a court could deem a retirement to be the equivalent of a resignation for the purposes of 4 NYCRR 5.3(b). [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 3:23 am by Peter Mahler
A recent decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla in MFB Realty LLC v Eichner, 2016 NY Slip Op 31242(U) [Sup Ct NY County June 24, 2016], in which she dismissed derivative claims by a mere assignee of LLC interests, starkly illustrates the distinction and the importance of compliance with the LLC agreement’s provisions for bestowing member status on assignees. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
 In the US, cheeses are usually made from cow’s, goat’s, sheep’s, or buffalo’s milk. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Florida International University Board of Trustees v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 11:16 am
We then address defendant's contention that the trial court should have granted his demurrer.State v. [read post]