Search for: "US v. George" Results 3341 - 3360 of 6,142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2014, 7:44 am by Ben
(Southern District Court of Texas Case No. 4:14-cv-01094).US Law firm Dunlap, Grubb and Weaver, apparently pioneers of BitTorrent "copyright troll" cases, have thrown in the towel against a counterclaim brought against them by an alleged pirate, and have been ordered by Judge George O’Toole  to pay nearly $40,000 in damages and costs. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am by Schachtman
See generally Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, and Douglas Altman, Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context (2001). [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm by Guest Blogger
As Justice Sotomayor eloquently reminds us in Schuette v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:39 am by emagraken
 The Defendant spend several minutes using a ice scraper to remove the snow. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:39 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 56786 (ED CA, April 22, 2014), a California federal district court permitted a Muslim inmate to move forward with his claim that his rights under RLUIPA were violated by a rule that barred inmates serving a sentence of life without possibility of parole from having conjugal visits.In George v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 4:11 am by Amy Howe
Send us your links! [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm
  Part II of details how the influential lower court decisions of Ezell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:55 am by David Gans
  Ten months ago, in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:58 am by Tom Smith
It would use the Constitution’s Article V to move the nation back toward the limited government the Constitution’s Framers thought their document guaranteed. [read post]