Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 3361 - 3380 of 15,424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding:   Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
Escott, R (On the application of) v Chichester District Council (2020) EWHC 1687 (Admin) A judicial review where the relevant parts played out in the early stages of the pandemic lockdown, and where the central question was whether self contained accommodation provided without a fridge, cooker and bed, was suitable within the meaning of section 206 Housing Act 1996, such that interim relief could be ordered. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:19 am by Eric Goldman
In my conversation with James Grimmelmann from Cornell on Galley, he argued that Section 230 was outdated and needed to be amended, because among other things he said that it was “too strong as applied to truly bad-faith actors who rile up their user populations to post incredibly harmful stuff that is technically coming from a third party so that the platform itself is immune. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:43 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
| "Single unit of publication" registrations require publication as a singular, bundled collection, the 9th Circuit rules: Unicolors v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 6:06 am by Andrew Delaney
Last week, I imagined a conversation between my 40-year-old self and my six-year-old self. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
Misclassification may result in an underestimate of peritoneal mesothelioma and an overestimate of ovarian cancer or the converse. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm by Matthew Kahn
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm by Sandy Levinson
  How does the oath operate with regard to what I call The Constitution of Conversation—i.e. the only part of the Constitution that is really addressed in the American legal academy—as against the Constitution of Settlement that includes such words as two, four, six, two-thirds, or three-fourths? [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:02 pm by Brian M. Wright
The Washington State Supreme Court has rejected the “increased risk” test (elsewhere referred to as the “positional risk” doctrine) in several cases, most recently in Street v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am by Ashoka Mukpo
When Kishon McDonald saw the video of George Floyd’s murder at the hands of four officers from the Minneapolis Police Department, he could tell it was going to turn the country upside down. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by JB
This reading makes particular sense given the textual connections between The Preamble, Article I, section 18, Article II, Article III, section 2, Article V, Article VI, and Article VII.According to Article VII, until the Constitution is ratified by nine states, it does not come into effect. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am by UKSC Blog
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue,… [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 5:52 pm by Francis Pileggi
However, he said the buyer failed to state viable aiding and abetting claims, civil conspiracy, conversion and Colorado and Texas state law charges. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Conversation had a piece “Tracing homophobia in South Korea’s coronavirus surveillance program”. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 5:45 pm by Tom Smith
In a phone conversation with Google and YouTube representatives, Heritage Director Emilie Kao argued Heyer’s definition of gender dysphoria was consistent with the definition provided by the DSM-V. [read post]