Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 3361 - 3380
of 34,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
In Jardin v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 11:42 am
Additional Resources: Alvarado v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:44 am
These checkpoints must adhere to standards set forth in the Ingersoll v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 8:55 am
Alec Stone Sweet (HKU) & Mads Andenas (University of Oslo - Faculty of Law; Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London; University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law) have posted The Law and Politics of the General Principles of Law in the Twenty-First Century on SSRN. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Hernandez v Starbucks Corporation, 2017 WL 2971858 (C.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:18 pm
Coito v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:00 pm
Miles attended California Western School of Law, graduating in 2006. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:33 am
The question at issue in Kwikset v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:13 am
Ed’s law office specializes in providing law enforcement legal services to California law enforcement agencies and he also serves as the legal advisor and a legal consultant for numerous law enforcement agencies in California. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
The underlying case involves claimed wage and hour violations under both the FLSA and California state law. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:34 pm
By Diane Kindermann and Kristen Kortick United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am
The Northern District of California had found U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
In Jennifer Augustus v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Skyline Wesleyan Church v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
California law includes an unconscionability defense to any contract. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:08 pm
Whether those and other practical consequences of the hurried passage of the new law were considered by the California legislature is unclear. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 10:01 pm
Silicon Image, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
[1] See NACEPF v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:00 am
Earlier this week, a jury in the Northern District of California found that Google violated copyright laws when it used Java APIs to design Android—but could not reach a resolution on whether Google’s use of APIs constituted fair use. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:00 am
Earlier this week, a jury in the Northern District of California found that Google violated copyright laws when it used Java APIs to design Android—but could not reach a resolution on whether Google’s use of APIs constituted fair use. [read post]
