Search for: "City of New York v. State of New York" Results 3361 - 3380 of 10,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am by William Ford
Vance Spath placed the United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:26 am by William Ford
City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010). [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
This morning’s second case is City of Hays v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by John K. Ross
New York Attorney General: Nonprofits seeking to raise money from New Yorkers must turn over a list of their donors to the state each year—or face fines of $100 per day. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:57 am
Although it is unclear precisely what standard the Appellate Division applied, it cited its prior decision in Tapp v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 2:38 am by Jeremy Saland
The New York criminal lawyers at Crotty Saland PC represent clients in Assault in the Second Degree cases and other cases involving “dangerous instruments” throughout New York City and Hudson Valley region. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The two questions on this appeal are whether plaintiff City of New York (the City) is an intended third-party beneficiary of the architectural services contract between plaintiff Dormitory Authority of the State of New York (DASNY) and defendant Perkins Eastman Architects, P.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Striking expose of why subway construction costs so much more in New York City than in other cities like Paris and Hong Kong [Brian M. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 6:15 am
The defendant properly objected to items four and five, which called for information regarding the claims of other insureds, as those items sought information that was not necessary and proper to the prosecution of this action (see Diaz v City of New York, 140 AD3d 826, 827; Cabrera v Allstate Indem. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:59 am by William Ford
City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010). [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]